AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Type de strophes12/14/2023 ![]() Last year, Paul Lukas in the New Republicwrote about how smart quotes are killing the apostrophe, illustrating “how a software innovation doomed the inverted comma”. And those smart quotes can sometimes be dumb. It wouldn’t matter so much if the single quote mark always came out “straight” ( ) whether open or closed, but modern computer programs now offer “smart quotes”, which automatically (and supposedly intelligently) convert straight marks into curly ones. The TV show ’til Death didn’t seem to know that fact:Īnd nether did Mitt Romney during his presidential campaign: ![]() Which is like a curly apostrophe turned upside-down, and it should never be upside down. ![]() Oops: that ‘apostrophe’ is pointing upwards. That’s because it isn’t really an apostrophe at all: it’s an open single quote mark, or an open inverted comma. When it immediately follows a group of letters or is wedged between two, as is usually the case when we’re apostrophizing, then it pops up as the closed single quote - that s the one - and we’re fine and dandy.īut what happens when we type our ‘strophe (using our single quote key) at the start of a word - in an unusual setting for an apostrophe, before a group of letters? Then we’re in trouble, because look what happens: allo allo. ![]() children, men), then its possessive apostrophe comes at the end of the word and it takes an added ‘s’, as if it were singular: “We carried the children’s coats”.Īn apostrophe always points downwards, whether it’s straight or curly. (Stay with me here: it gets interesting.) It bears a convenient uncanny resemblance to the single quote ( ), which is why we use that keyboard key for typing it. * * If a plural noun doesn’t have a final ‘s’ (e.g. * The fun starts when a name ending in ‘s’ becomes possessive: it should still always carry the apostrophe, but whether to add an extra ‘s’ is a matter for debate and personal choice. the apostrophe takes the place of the dropped ‘i’) and it still makes sense, then you need an apostrophe. Its or it’s? Simple: if you can replace the word in question with “it is” (i.e. So that’s David’s hat?* Yes, that hat’s David’s hat.” And if that possessive something or someone is plural**, we add the apostrophe after the plural ‘s’ and we don’t add the extra ‘s’: “At the We’re Called David conference, when the wine flows all the Davids’ tongues start to wag.” Now to its possessive use: when something or someone “has” an object (or that object is “of” them), you just add an apostrophe plus an ‘s’: “David has a hat. Sometimes it’s used to replace a letter dropped in pronunciation: Singin’ in the Rain ‘allo, ‘allo stick ’em up! And sometimes the front of a word (even one spelled with numbers) has been chopped off and the noble apostrophe steps in: the 1960s becomes the swinging ’60s. In the case of filling in for missing letters, it often pops up when two words are being put together and a couple of letters are dropped in the process, for example when “do not” becomes don’t, when “can not” becomes can’t, when “they are” becomes they’re, or “that is” becomes that’s. Contrary to popular belief, the apostrophe doesn’t make plurals, and it doesn’t automatically slide in front of the final letter of any word that happens to end in ‘s’… It has just two basic uses: to fill in for an omitted letter or letters, and to make a word possessive. Except perhaps when it comes to its typography, not to its role in spelling. Orange’s and lemon’s: says who?īut it does have a bit of a bad rap, this aerial word-comma: it’s really not as complicated as the world seems to think it is. It’s unquestionably the most misused punctuation mark in the English language - so much so that its errant form has its own nickname: “the greengrocer’s apostrophe” (and that’s from widespread abuse on signage by guilty tradesmen).
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |